The Supreme Court Zambia as of late dismissed a claim from the Ventriglia family. In their claim, the Ventriglia family guaranteed that the decision made by the higher Court of Appeal on Portland Cement Zambia wasn’t right. Being an equitable and straightforward legitimate body, the Supreme Court set up a seat of three appointed Supreme Court judges for assessing whether to acknowledge or dismiss the case. These appointed authorities included Justice Mumba Malila, Justice Royda Kaoma and Justice Michael Musonda. Together, the appointed authorities assessed the case and discovered a few inconsistencies. The first and most significant inquiry to the Ventriglia family was that for what reason did they made their claim so late?
As per law, any case against past court choices should be made inside 14 days of the actual decision. Since the decision from the Court of Appeal went ahead on 31st January 2019, the Ventriglia family ought to have enrolled their claim within two weeks of the Court of Appeal’s verdict. It ought to be noted here that after Lusaka High Court gave a disputable choice on the Portland Cement Zambia case, Dr. Rajan Mahtani promptly moved toward the higher Court of Appeal, keeping up with the legal requirements when registering such cases. In any case, the Ventriglia family enrolled their challenge after more than 1.5 years which brings up issues on their goals as well as puts forth the defence dubious. Moreover, the Supreme Court seat additionally said that the claim from the Ventriglia family was past the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. In the wake of investigating all confirmations, tributes and the conditions encompassing the claim, the Supreme Court seat at long last reasoned that the claim from the Ventriglia family should be effectively dismissed.